My refutation to Mr. Sugimori’s opinion
I partly argue about Mr. Sugimori's black company problem. (http://jazzclarinet.weebly.com) However, for the most part I agree with Mr. Sugimori's opinion.
Mr. Sugimori said that black companies are becoming a social problem in modern Japan, As a premise, The employment system in Japan is a very special form among the world, In Japan, it is unknown to the principal about the content of the duties and the place of work before joining the company, and you do not know when you can order another duty after entering the company, Also there is a case that It is almost impossible for us to return home within legal working hours and if it is told that overtime is necessary, we have to forcefully accept it, however there is no further overtime payment.
In addition, Mr. Sugimori said about Japan's employment system, that In Japan it is almost impossible to change jobs as lifetime employment is rooted and due to lifetime employment, once you retire, it is difficult to find the next job Therefore, even if my employer is a black company cannot retire, continue to work until the body is broken.
The final opinion of Mr. Sugimori based on this is as follows. It is necessary to change the form of employment in Japan. Explain specific job functions to employment contract. Furthermore, it is necessary to eliminate customs of overtime work.
I think that Sugimori's approach to black companies is insufficient and believe that eliminating black companies is an issue of contemporary Japan. Mr. Sugimori says the revolution of employment form is first. However, even if change the form of employment, are not only new recruits able to benefit from it? In other words, it is not an intrinsic solution of black companies. Then, what is necessary for essential reform of black companies? I think that improvement of the labor standards law is necessary. The Labor Standards Law is currently one of the most unprotected laws in Japan. That is because there are penalties however, it is very difficult to apply it. I believe that it is necessary to create a system that allows employee to accuse it if employer violates the Labor Standards law.
362 words
Mr. Sugimori said that black companies are becoming a social problem in modern Japan, As a premise, The employment system in Japan is a very special form among the world, In Japan, it is unknown to the principal about the content of the duties and the place of work before joining the company, and you do not know when you can order another duty after entering the company, Also there is a case that It is almost impossible for us to return home within legal working hours and if it is told that overtime is necessary, we have to forcefully accept it, however there is no further overtime payment.
In addition, Mr. Sugimori said about Japan's employment system, that In Japan it is almost impossible to change jobs as lifetime employment is rooted and due to lifetime employment, once you retire, it is difficult to find the next job Therefore, even if my employer is a black company cannot retire, continue to work until the body is broken.
The final opinion of Mr. Sugimori based on this is as follows. It is necessary to change the form of employment in Japan. Explain specific job functions to employment contract. Furthermore, it is necessary to eliminate customs of overtime work.
I think that Sugimori's approach to black companies is insufficient and believe that eliminating black companies is an issue of contemporary Japan. Mr. Sugimori says the revolution of employment form is first. However, even if change the form of employment, are not only new recruits able to benefit from it? In other words, it is not an intrinsic solution of black companies. Then, what is necessary for essential reform of black companies? I think that improvement of the labor standards law is necessary. The Labor Standards Law is currently one of the most unprotected laws in Japan. That is because there are penalties however, it is very difficult to apply it. I believe that it is necessary to create a system that allows employee to accuse it if employer violates the Labor Standards law.
362 words